Cointelegraph
DOGE$0.06934 4.79%
TRX$0.3286 0.08%
LINK$8.44 2.06%
ZEC$508.44 1.36%
ADA$0.1672 4.20%
XRP$1.11 2.52%
ETH$1,875.65 2.79%
BTC$65,110.95 1.14%
XMR$354.38 1.27%
BNB$568.11 0.47%
XLM$0.1828 1.97%
SOL$75.99 2.56%
HYPE$57.92 1.82%
Written by Turner Wrightstaff writerReviewed by Ana Paula Pereirastaff editor

Whale Moves $1.3 Billion in Bitcoin… The Question Is Why?

Latest NewsPublishedJun 11, 2020

An unknown whale has moved $1.3 billion BTC in three transactions.

whale-moves-13-billion-in-bitcoin-the-question-is-why

As Bitcoin continues to hold above $9,800, one whale decided now was the time to move more than $1 billion in BTC.

According to blockchain data, an unknown Bitcoin (BTC) trader moved over 132,255 BTC — roughly $1.3 billion — in three transactions just one minute apart on June 11. The cryptocurrency was moved in block 643,133.

The transactions came as the price of BTC was still under a key resistance level, $10,000. At the time of writing, 1 BTC is valued at $9,887.

The massive volume led to speculation the BTC belonged to an exchange or custodial service with one user on Reddit speculating Coinbase Custody was responsible.

Still not the highest BTC transaction

Cointelegraph reported in April that crypto exchange Bitfinex had moved 161,500 BTC, or $1.1 billion at the time, making it the largest single transaction of Bitcoin in history.

However, neither Bitfinex’s or this whale’s transaction were actually the largest amount of the cryptocurrency to ever be moved. That honor goes to a 550,000 BTC transaction made on November 16, 2011. Worth $1.32 million at that time, that amount of Bitcoin could be liquidated for approximately $4.9 billion today.

1 minute letter

Subscribe to daily byte-sized crypto news from Cointelegraph

Subscribe
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

More on the subject