The story of Prometheus is one of the great fables from antiquity, and it still carries wisdom after thousands of years.
For anyone unfamiliar, Prometheus was a mythical Titan in Ancient Greece who made man from clay and, despite stern warnings from the other gods, gave man fire. His punishment for giving man fire was to be bound eternally to a rock, and each day an eagle would come eat his liver from his body which would regenerate again overnight so that he could endure the same punishment the next day.
At its core, Prometheus’ story is one of democratization: He took a powerful tool out of the hands of a central authority, the gods, and gave it to the people. The inherent wisdom is that the story accurately predicts two things will happen whenever a powerful tool becomes democratized: The central authority is unwilling to concede the tool in question to the people, and early adopters confirm the central authority’s belief that people should not have democratic access to such a powerful tool. History supports this model.
We as humans don’t have a Titan to hand us tools from on high to move our civilizations forward, so we have to rely on disruptive innovations to get us there. And the things these innovations tend to disrupt are the gods on high, or at least some entrenched status quo.
Information has long been one of the most powerful, and most coveted, tools. A monopoly over information allows a central authority to wield a great deal of power.
Below are three examples of how a technological innovation wrenched some kind of information from a central authority and made it available to everyone. As the story of Prometheus foretold, the central authority fought back, and some of the first people who handled that technology managed to burn themselves.
The Printing Press: Literacy Democratized, Church Threatened
The printing press was introduced to Western society in 1453 when Johannes Gutenberg came up with a superior method of printing with movable type. All of a sudden, a single machine could produce books and manuscripts at 1,000 times the speed of a scribe.
This made books considerably cheaper to buy, and within a generation, literacy began to spread. The democratization of book-learning threatened the Catholic church’s monopoly over Biblical interpretations in the West, as suddenly the bible was available to other people, not only the clergy – and began to be translated into modern languages. With common people able to interpret religious texts for themselves, many no longer felt they had to put their trust in their local clergy’s interpretation of the Bible, and the Protestant Reformation was born.
Despite the can of worms popular access to books opened up, Europeans became increasingly literate people, and science and scholarship flourished in the ensuing centuries.
The Internet: Global Communication Democratized, States and Governments Threatened
The internet has now penetrated a full third of humanity, allowing us to share ideas in real time with others around the world. Do I really need to give examples of how this technology has gotten people in trouble?
It is hard to get a historical perspective on the internet because we are still living through its disruptive phase, strange as that may sound. The Great Firewall of China and the mayor of Peoria, Illinois, can both currently attest to this disruption. Suffice it to say there are still many institutions with entrenched positions that benefit from censorship and information scarcity.
Decentralized Applications: Currency Already Democratized, States and Banks Threatened
I’m leaning on David A. Johnston’s definition of a decentralized app here:
1. The application must be completely open-source, it must operate autonomously, with no entity controlling the majority of its tokens, and its data and records of operation must be cryptographically stored in a public, decentralized block chain.
2. The application must generate tokens according to a standard algorithm or set of criteria and possibly distribute some or all of its tokens at the beginning of its operation. These tokens must be necessary for the use of the application and any contribution from users should be rewarded by payment in the application’s tokens.
3. The application may adapt its protocol in response to proposed improvements and market feedback but all changes must be decided by majority consensus of its users.
Bitcoin represents the first such decentralized application, and it has already replaced the need for trust in banking institutions with hard math. But the technology has also been accompanied by problems https://www.mtgox.com/. Mark Karpeles assumes the role of the first mythical Greek to burn his own house down.
Going forward, new decentralized apps are going to offer cryptography as an alternative to the need for trust in a number of organizations (Ethereum uses the examples of trusting centralized sites such Facebook with your online persona or Dropbox with your files). This threatens whole industries and political structures.
What these next-generation apps will be or will be able to do is anybody’s guess, but I am excited to live through this period of history.