Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. explains why integrating Bitcoin into US reserves is the only way to preserve the dominance of the US dollar and address other economic issues affecting the country. He also shares how he first discovered Bitcoin and why he passionately supports it.
Watch the interview on Cointelegraph’s YouTube channel.
Follow Cointelegraph on X @Cointelegraph.
Follow this episode’s hosts, Gareth Jenkinson and Sam Bourgi, on X at @gazza_jenks and @forgeforth_
Timestamps:
(00:00) - Introduction to the episode
(00:41) - Kennedy’s introduction to Bitcoin
(03:35) - Сhanging perceptions of Bitcoin among policymakers
(05:15) - Integration of Bitcoin into the US economy
The views, thoughts and opinions expressed in this podcast are its participants’ alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph. This podcast (and any related content) is for entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, nor should it be taken as such. Everyone must do their own research and make their own decisions. The podcast’s participants may or may not own any of the assets mentioned.
RFK Jr: Why America should buy Bitcoin
Transcript
In this conversation with Cointelegraph’s US news editor, Sam Bourgi, Kennedy explains why integrating Bitcoin into US government reserves could help preserve the dominance of the US dollar.
[00:00:40] Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: I heard about Bitcoin from my kids. I’ve got seven kids, and they were, a bunch of them were kind of college-age and interested in finance, and they’re very entrepreneurial. And so they had gotten in small ways into Bitcoin very early. And for me, it was kind of just a novelty, and I didn’t understand much about it. And then I was involved in the trucker strike in Canada. And during that period, I saw what happened. This was a very peaceful protest, people exercising freedoms that we take for granted in this country, freedom of assembly. They were protesting some of the economic impacts of the mandates. It was like a Woodstock-like crowd. It was very diverse and very kind.
Yet the Canadian government portrayed it publicly as kind of a terrorist reunion, and they began using technologies like facial recognition systems to identify people who were participating and then freezing their bank accounts. They froze a $12 million PayPal account. And at that point, I was in shock because none of these people had been charged with a crime. None of them had been, of course, convicted. And yet the government was shutting down their bank accounts so they couldn’t pay for their diesel, they couldn’t pay for their kids’ food, they couldn’t make their rent, couldn’t pay for their mortgages. And, you know, one trucker told me that he was going to jail because he couldn’t pay its alimony.
And I realized at that time that transactional freedom was as important as freedom of expression that is protected by the First Amendment. If we didn’t figure out a mechanism for guaranteeing transactional freedom, that we were headed to a really dystopian world where the government could turn us into slaves. Because if the government can punish its critics, silence its critics by throwing them out of their homes or starving their children, it has license for every atrocity. We become slaves. And Bitcoin became, for me, the extraordinarily elegant solution to so many of our problems. It became an off-ramp for inflation and a hedge against inflation, an off-ramp from these existential deficits we’re now suffering. It’s a way to challenge the war machine because the war machine is funded just on printing money, you know, without even asking permission. It’s a guarantee of personal freedoms, of responsibility, of self-sovereignty. It’s also a way to guarantee fair and free elections. The blockchain, that can’t be tampered with, or protects democracy in that way. It’s a weapon as well, a defensive weapon against cyberattack, the most potent weapon against the cyberattack. And the more excited, it’s essentially optimistic nature that it promotes entrepreneurship, promotes innovation, it promotes freedom. And I’m just like a very, very optimistic future, which we badly need today.
[00:03:35] Sam Bourgi: And I saw your keynote last year at Bitcoin Miami. And I want to bring that up because the tone around Bitcoin seems to have changed drastically over the past year. Can you kind of explain how the shift is happening on Capitol Hill in Washington? Why are now policymakers suddenly seem to be more understanding and open to Bitcoin?
[00:03:54] Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: I think there’s 60 million Bitcoiners in our country, and they’re very energetic, and they’ve been able to talk to their legislature. So now, a majority of people in Congress and the Senate wanna see Bitcoin transactional. They want to see it untaxable. They want to encourage it. They want to end the war. And the Biden administration, either knowingly or through inertia, has been locked in war with Bitcoin. And Chairman Gensler is very, very hostile to Bitcoin personally. And they’ve put it in the way every impediment to it. But I think Bitcoin crossed a tipping point this year. I think a year ago, nobody would consider Bitcoin inevitable.
I think now it’s past the point where it’s inevitable, and now we need to move as a country that’s able to get some control over Bitcoin as part of a largest reserve is that’s going to control the world. And so, if we want to continue with having the world’s global reserve currency, the world’s global preferred trade currency, and the world’s safe haven currency, we need to move quickly to integrate Bitcoin into our reserves and the world. And that will launch a cascading effect that is going to happen, all these extraordinary benefits for our country.
[00:05:15] Sam Bourgi: You recently mentioned Bitcoin being honest currency or honest money. And we can’t say the same thing about the US dollar or any other fiat currency and the role that the Fed has played in debasing the currency. I know you’ve talked about it a lot. How can Bitcoin potentially fix the Fed? The Fed has a dual mandate of, you know, supporting the economy and also supporting price stability. Well, they’ve kind of gaslit all of us in since 2021. And they said there’s no inflation. Well, it was the biggest inflation spike in 40 years. So, what role do you think Bitcoin can play with respect to the Fed and making the Fed’s job better and making them more honest at what they do?
[00:05:49] Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: I think we need to link at least some of our Treasury bills and some of our notes to hard currency, and that would include Bitcoin. I think Bitcoin is the most efficient because it is the perfect money. It’s transactional across the globe. I mean, if you imagine what it will do if we link the dollar to it, it will guarantee the future of the dollar. It is permanent reserve currency in the globe because everybody wants dollars. If you live in China, if you live in Russia, your wealth can be confiscated anytime by tyrannical leaders.
So, all the people who have wealth in those countries would rather have their wealth in the United States. That’s why you see the Chinese buying up real estate, etc., any kind of hard assets. But, and Bitcoin is a hard asset, but it’s hard to buy real estate in the United States. But if you could buy Bitcoin, if you could do it on your cellphone, if you could do it when person-to-person transactions, with no friction. In other words, no fees, no banks, bank accounts, you can just do it person to person. It frees the flow of money all over the world, and that money is going to flow towards the United States. Those assets, that wealth, will flow back into our country because everybody wants to put their money, and that will fix our, among other things, our balance of payments. It also, if you tie it to the dollar, it injects discipline into the Fed. We’re going to do other things to fix the Fed, too. It makes it so they can’t just engage in this orgy of money printing with no consequence and no tie to reality. And you know, if we are the first movers on Bitcoin and we get 4 million Bitcoins, it would cost us around $750 billion to do that, but within a few years, that’s going to be worth $100 trillion. And that money will generate wealth every year, enough to neutralize our budget deficits. That’s how you get rid of this extraordinary, this existential debt. So, it’s an elegant solution for almost everything.
[00:07:52] Sam Bourgi: Do you think a lot of the damage has already been done? We see a lot of companies that have moved overseas and that are not looking at the US with the same optimism they once did. How big is that threat that we lose blockchain innovation, Bitcoin innovation going overseas?
[00:08:04] Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: I think we could get it back. We change policy. People would rather be in this country. People would rather be here mainly than Switzerland or Dubai or Singapore. And you know, there’s a lot of still trust in the US government, and I think this will make the government more trustworthy. And it will encourage people to want to move wealth and business here.
[00:08:26] Sam Bourgi: And thank you.
[00:08:27] Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: Alright, thank you.
[00:08:28] Sam Bourgi: Thank you so much.
[00:08:29] Gareth Jenkinson: Thanks again for listening to this episode of Decentralize with Cointelegraph. If you enjoyed this content, make sure you like, subscribe and share. We look forward to welcoming you back for our next episode.
This podcast episode transcription was generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) technology. While we strive for accuracy, please be aware that AI-generated transcriptions may contain errors or inaccuracies.
Highlights
(00:41) - Kennedy’s introduction to Bitcoin
(03:35) - Сhanging perceptions of Bitcoin among policymakers
(05:15) - Integration of Bitcoin into the US economy
Episodes
Crypto’s real-world adoption in 2025 and what builders should expect in 2026
2025 was a year of major shifts for crypto and not just in headlines, but in what actually matters for builders: fundamentals, real-world use cases and sustainable revenue.
In this episode of Byte-Sized Insight, we are joined by Leonard Dorlöchter, co-founder of peaq, to break down what quietly worked in 2025 and what the industry should be paying attention to in 2026. Leonard explains how DePIN began gaining real traction, why “fundamentals started mattering more,” and how the industry may be maturing while also losing sight of Web3’s original decentralization ethos.
The conversation also explores the rise of AI agents and robotics, new standards for machine-to-machine coordination, and what it could look like when devices, machines and autonomous agents begin transacting onchain as part of a global machine economy.
(1:58) Leonard introduces peaq and the “machine economy”
(4:03) 2025 shift: fundamentals and real revenue start to matter
(5:24) Web3 maturity vs. losing the decentralization ethos
(7:33) Blockchain as neutral global infrastructure and governance layer
(10:45) 2025 breakthroughs: physical AI and new standards for agents
(12:18) Why machine coordination is moving onchain
(13:31) Breaking down “machine economy” onchain vs offchain
(14:01) Example: tokenized machines, peer-to-peer energy, shared ownership
(17:51) Trust, reputation and efficiency in an open-machine economy
(20:23) Real-world adoption: robot in production in Hong Kong, onchain rewards
(22:06) 2026 outlook: robotics protocols, onchain goods/services, sovereign agents
(25:12) Policy gap: regulation progress but not fully aligned with Web3 ethos
(28:42) Why peaq partnered with VARA, machine economy free zone sandbox
(30:12) Builder advice for 2026: validate value, traction and real revenue
This episode was hosted and produced by Savannah Fortis, @savannah_fortis.
Follow Cointelegraph on X @Cointelegraph.
Check out Cointelegraph at cointelegraph.com.
If you like what you heard, rate us and leave a review!
The views, thoughts and opinions expressed in this podcast are its participants alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph. This podcast (and any related content) is for entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, nor should it be taken as such. Everyone must do their own research and make their own decisions. The podcast’s participants may or may not own any of the assets mentioned.
Stablecoins took over crypto in 2025: Here’s what the data says about 2026 (feat. Chainalysis)
2025 marked a turning point for crypto not in price cycles or hype, but in how the industry is actually used, regulated and understood.
In this episode of Byte-Sized Insight, we’re joined by Matthias Bauer-Langgartner, Head of Policy for Europe at Chainalysis, to break down what really happened in crypto in 2025, using data, not headlines.
We dig into how 2025 became the year of the stablecoin, how stablecoins now dominate on-chain activity and crypto crime, why illicit crypto flows surged even as adoption went mainstream and how crypto crime has taken on a more geopolitical dimension. The conversation also goes into how regulators, particularly in Europe, have matured in their approach, what MiCA changed on the ground and what crypto companies should be preparing for as they head into 2026.
You don’t want to miss it!
(00:08) Welcome to Byte-Sized Insight + 2026 series kickoff
(01:20) Introducing Matthias Bauer-Langgartner and Chainalysis
(03:47) Where the global crypto industry stands in January 2026
(04:40) On-chain growth and the rise of stablecoins
(05:58) Stablecoins overtake Bitcoin in transactional volume
(09:02) Why regulators focus on stablecoins first
(11:06) Institutional adoption and MiCA’s impact in Europe
(13:18) Are European regulators more confident after 2025?
(17:38) Who really has leverage in crypto now?
(19:49) Crypto Crime Report 2025: record illicit flows
(21:44) Nation-state crypto crime and sanctioned stablecoins
(23:17) Why stablecoins dominate illicit activity and why that matters
(28:15) Top policy, crime, and security trends for 2026
(32:10) Cybersecurity, DORA, and real-time on-chain monitoring
(34:27) Advice for crypto companies entering Europe in 2026
This episode was hosted and produced by Savannah Fortis, @savannah_fortis.
Follow Cointelegraph on X @Cointelegraph.
Check out Cointelegraph at cointelegraph.com.
If you like what you heard, rate us and leave a review!
The views, thoughts and opinions expressed in this podcast are its participants alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph. This podcast (and any related content) is for entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, nor should it be taken as such. Everyone must do their own research and make their own decisions. The podcast’s participants may or may not own any of the assets mentioned.
UK crypto regulation is coming: Inside the FCA’s sweeping new consultation
The UK is taking a major step toward fully regulating crypto markets.
This week on Byte-Sized Insight, we break down the Financial Conduct Authority’s sweeping new consultation covering crypto exchanges, staking services, lending, and decentralized finance and what it could mean for the future of the UK crypto industry.
We’re joined by Perry Scott, Head of UK Policy at Kraken and Chair of the UK Cryptoasset Business Council, to unpack what’s actually new in the proposals, why the October 2027 timeline matters and whether regulatory clarity could make the UK more competitive globally.
(00:00) Welcome to Byte-Sized Insight
(00:45) UK launches sweeping crypto consultation
(03:20) Why this is a turning point for UK crypto
(05:00) Perry Scott on the scale of the proposals
(06:45) The 2027 timeline: “the firing gun has been fired”
(08:20) UK vs EU vs US: second-mover advantage
(09:45) Market structure and global liquidity
(11:05) Staking gets bespoke rules
(12:20) Crypto lending: from bans to guardrails
(13:35) How the FCA is approaching DeFi
(15:10) Will regulation drive firms offshore?
(17:20) What comes next for UK crypto
This episode was hosted and produced by Savannah Fortis, @savannah_fortis.
Follow Cointelegraph on X @Cointelegraph.
Check out Cointelegraph at cointelegraph.com.
If you like what you heard, rate us and leave a review!
The views, thoughts and opinions expressed in this podcast are its participants alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph. This podcast (and any related content) is for entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, nor should it be taken as such. Everyone must do their own research and make their own decisions. The podcast’s participants may or may not own any of the assets mentioned.
Can ESMA Fix MiCA?: Europe regulated crypto first, now it considers a central regulator
Europe was the first major region to roll out a comprehensive crypto framework, but now it’s rethinking how that framework is enforced.
In this episode of Byte-Sized Insight, we break down the European Union’s proposal to centralize crypto supervision under the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), a move that would shift oversight of crypto-asset service providers away from national regulators and toward a single EU-level authority.
To understand what’s happening on the ground, we speak with Dr. Lewin Boehnke, chief strategy officer at Crypto Finance Group, who offers a rare perspective from both Switzerland’s mature crypto market and the EU’s newly regulated one. He explains why MiCA’s overall approach makes sense, where technical details are slowing adoption and why centralizing supervision under ESMA could actually help reduce friction rather than create it.
(1:55) Europe moves to centralize crypto oversight under ESMA
(4:58) Why MiCA’s rollout has been slow, and why that’s not surprising
(5:24) Switzerland’s head start on institutional crypto adoption
(6:38) Why MiCA’s focus on regulating intermediaries makes sense
(7:48) The MiCA Article 75.6 ambiguity slowing banks down
(9:09) Why Europe’s quieter regulatory approach may be a long-term strength
(10:13) Uneven MiCA enforcement across Germany, Luxembourg, and Malta
(12:26) What Europe should prioritize in crypto regulation over the next year
This episode was hosted and produced by Savannah Fortis, @savannah_fortis.
Follow Cointelegraph on X @Cointelegraph.
Check out Cointelegraph at cointelegraph.com.
If you like what you heard, rate us and leave a review!
The views, thoughts and opinions expressed in this podcast are its participants alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph. This podcast (and any related content) is for entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, nor should it be taken as such. Everyone must do their own research and make their own decisions. The podcast’s participants may or may not own any of the assets mentioned.
The first U.S. state to buy Bitcoin: Why is Texas going all in?
Texas just became the first US state to purchase and hold Bitcoin, and it did so during a market downturn, while many institutions and state treasuries were selling or backing away from crypto entirely.
In this episode of Byte-Sized Insight, we break down alongside Lee Bratcher, founder and president of the Texas Blockchain Council, why Texas made a $5 million Bitcoin ETF purchase (with another $5 million earmarked for self-custodied BTC), how a years-long political history set the stage and what this move means for US crypto policy.
Is Texas making a bold strategic play or taking on unnecessary risk? And could this be the spark that reignites the conversation around Bitcoin in public finance?
(00:08) Texas becomes the first U.S. state to purchase and hold Bitcoin
(00:33) Why Texas buying Bitcoin during a downturn matters
(02:28) Texas’s long-term Bitcoin thesis and the significance of the timing
(03:38) Greg Abbott’s early Bitcoin advocacy: 11 years before Texas’s buy
(04:54) Abbott on Texas becoming a global hub for Bitcoin and blockchain
(08:05) Why Texas is treating Bitcoin as a multi-decade strategic asset
(09:34) How Texas’s Bitcoin purchase could influence other U.S. states and policymakers
(11:13) Texas’s energy, finance, and demographic advantages in Bitcoin adoption
(12:55) Closing insight: Texas and Bitcoin as long-term partners beyond market cycles
This episode was hosted and produced by Savannah Fortis, @savannah_fortis.
Follow Cointelegraph on X @Cointelegraph.
Check out Cointelegraph at cointelegraph.com.
If you like what you heard, rate us and leave a review!
The views, thoughts and opinions expressed in this podcast are its participants alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph. This podcast (and any related content) is for entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, nor should it be taken as such. Everyone must do their own research and make their own decisions. The podcast’s participants may or may not own any of the assets mentioned.
Crypto turbulence in 2025 explained: A practical guide to navigating market volatility
The crypto markets have been battered over the past several weeks with Bitcoin sinking from six-figure highs to the low-$80Ks, more than a trillion dollars wiped from crypto’s total market cap and record ETF outflows shaking investor sentiment. Unlike previous drawdowns triggered by blow-ups or bad actors, this downturn is different: It’s macro-driven, liquidity-driven and deeply tied to broader global markets.
In this episode of Byte-Sized Insight we hear from the author of “Crypto is Macro Now,” Noelle Acheson; co-founder and CEO of LO:TECH, Tim Meggs; and author of “The Crypto Trader,” Glen Goodman, to help break down the forces behind the volatility and offer clear, grounded perspective for navigating the turbulence.
(0:24) Bitcoin plunges from $120K to $80K and the market wipes out $1.2 trillion
(1:08) Why this downturn feels different from past crashes
(2:55) Noelle Acheson explains why the dip is “a blip” and liquidity-driven
(3:52) How macro sentiment, not crypto-specific issues, is driving this correction
(4:59) Why this drawdown isn’t systemic like 2017 or 2022
(6:03) Bitcoin dominance drops during the downturn and why that’s never happened before
(7:38) Noelle breaks down “short-term noise vs. long-term debasement thesis”
(10:28) Tim Meggs: Why this drawdown is slow, measured, and institution-driven
(12:05) Inside the market: What liquidity providers look for during stress
(13:22) Signs of stabilization and why healthy corrections matter
(15:41) Glen Goodman: How institutional money changed the structure of crypto cycles
(20:34) Why today’s downturn lacks a narrative and why that weakens crypto rallies
(23:04) Survival rules: managing leverage, mental resilience & “reduce to the sleeping point”
This episode was hosted and produced by Savannah Fortis, @savannah_fortis.
Follow Cointelegraph on X @Cointelegraph.
Check out Cointelegraph at cointelegraph.com.
If you like what you heard, rate us and leave a review!
The views, thoughts and opinions expressed in this podcast are its participants alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph. This podcast (and any related content) is for entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, nor should it be taken as such. Everyone must do their own research and make their own decisions. The podcast’s participants may or may not own any of the assets mentioned.
Authors
About podcast
The Decentralize with Cointelegraph podcast covers all things Web3 and cryptocurrency, from challenges facing the industry to breaking news and in-depth dives into the culture of BTC, Ethereum and Web3. Experience crypto news like never before with the Decentralize with Cointelegraph podcast.
Other podcasts
Disclaimer These podcasts (and any related content) are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, nor should they be taken as such. Everyone must do their own research and make their own decisions. The podcasts' participants may or may not own any of the assets mentioned.

.png)




