Cointelegraph
DOGE$0.06915 0.84%
TRX$0.3276 0.45%
LINK$8.05 1.23%
ZEC$461.70 1.47%
ADA$0.1737 3.31%
XRP$1.06 0.24%
ETH$1,843.78 0.97%
BTC$62,769.12 0.34%
XMR$361.00 1.45%
BNB$575.60 2.10%
XLM$0.1706 0.93%
SOL$71.77 1.64%
HYPE$52.17 0.18%
Written by William Subergstaff writerReviewed by Igor Belkinformer editor

Bitcoin Future: ‘Exponential’ Price, Centralization ‘Avoided’ - Beautyon

Latest NewsPublishedJul 24, 2017

Bitcoin Think editor Beautyon has told a journalist he believes Bitcoin’s future price will be “exponential” without centralization.

bitcoin-future-exponential-price-centralization-avoided-beautyon

The future of Bitcoin for well-known blogger and commentator Beautyon includes “exponential” price and zero centralization.

That’s according to answers given when a journalist got in touch to discuss what the virtual currency might look like in years to come.

A journalist just asked me “What does the future look like for Bitcoin?” pic.twitter.com/GkKksrszGz — BeaUASFtyon (@Beautyon_) July 21, 2017

The editor of Bitcoin Think is well-known for forming a hardline stance against attempts to centrally control aspects of the Bitcoin network, openly criticizing moves by the industry’s biggest names and businesses.

A February blog post on the SegWit debate labeled Barry Silbert’s Digital Currency Group “dangerous” and “reckless” for its style of criticism published previously.

“It is only difficult to know what to support if you don’t understand Bitcoin and what improvements Segregated Witness (SegWit) offers,” the post read.

In the future, Beautyon says, Bitcoin will have “prevented” its “corporate takeover,” while the likelihood of a future takeover will be “greatly decreased.”

The full list of answers appeared as a tweet Friday.

1 minute letter

Subscribe to daily byte-sized crypto news from Cointelegraph

Subscribe
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

More on the subject