Receive all Cointelegraph news immediately in Telegram.
Rothschild Investment Corporation has no ties with the Rothschild family, according to NYT article.
Bitcoin pundits were intrigued by certain Rothschild Investment Corporation investment in Bitcoin.
However, recent updates come to light that the Rothschild Investment Corporation has no ties with the Rothschild family.
The issue was raised by a netizen after a post on Brian Cohen’s post gained media attention with the perception that the Rothschild family have bought Bitcoin through Bitcoin Investment Trust.
Yann Ranchere reacted to Cohen breaking the news that Rothschild has bought 539 shares from Bitcoin Investment Trust.
Yann Ranchere tweeted:
“Not the [Rothschild] you think”.
He also supplemented it with another update containing a link to a New York Times article detailing how the Rothschild name was conveniently used by other companies to bolster their image and credibility.
Lol. Rotschild investment Corp has no ties with the Rotschild family. But name helps https://t.co/NMCmjsDOwq— Yann Ranchere (@tek_fin) July 23, 2017
Lol. Rotschild investment Corp has no ties with the Rotschild family. But name helps https://t.co/NMCmjsDOwq
Others have also chimed in to help clarify:
This isn't rothschilds, they're are using their name but the roths use rothchild.— Mike Shd (@GMOMutation) July 24, 2017
This isn't rothschilds, they're are using their name but the roths use rothchild.
The Chicago-based investment firm’s founders are Monroe Rothschild and his brother-in-law Samuel Karger. In the New York Time article which was published on Jan. 15, 1995, Karger explains they didn’t plan on misleading as they never claimed to be affiliated with the Rothschild clan:
“Samuel Lieberman built his reputation as a trader with Chicago-based Rothschild Securities. He was hoping for continuity 11 years ago when starting his own firm. Monroe Rothschild founded Rothschild Securities in 1905. He never claimed a tie to the banking family, said his nephew, Robert S. Karger, the firm's chairman.”
It details that “look-alike or sound-alike names” have created an “instant aura of credibility” which is not new to financial institutions based on state securities regulators. It also added that “new brokerage firms with names that resonate with an illustrious history” may have unintentionally created an opportunity to confuse their investors.
Stanford Z. Rothschild, Baltimore Investment Manager says:
"People take names of high visibility in the hope it will mislead or rub off or infer something that's not really so."
But it is not only the Rothschild whose name was taken advantage. NYT article expands that J. J. Morgan & Co. of New York which can be confused with the New York banking company, J.P. Morgan.
Another company that’s victim of “look-alike name” was the A. S. Goldmen & Company which can be confused with Wall Street investment bank Goldman Sachs & Co.
Follow us on Facebook
For updates and exclusive offers, enter your e-mail below.
Thank you for contacting us! We will reply to you as soon as possible.
Thank you for your interest in our franchise program.
We are considering your request and will contact you in due course. If you have any further queries, please contact: