Brazil Central Bank Adopts IMF Guidelines for Crypto Classification
The Central Bank of Brazil has adopted guidelines from the International Monetary Fund for classifying cryptocurrencies.
The Central Bank of Brazil has moved to classify bought or sold cryptocurrency assets per International Monetary Fund (IMF) guidelines.
Brazil’s central bank announced its decision on Aug. 26. With the new classification under IMF standards, traded cryptocurrencies will be classified as non-financial products and as such, will be accounted as goods on the central bank’s balance sheet.
A central bank balance sheet, just like a regular bank’s balance sheet, summarizes its financial position, and is made up of assets, equity and liabilities.
Since purchasing and selling cryptocurrency involves the execution of foreign exchange contracts, the central bank considers selling and buying crypto assets in their export and import statistics. Moreover, because Brazil is a net importer of crypto assets, this apparently has contributed to lowering the trade surplus on its balance sheet.
Significance of cryptocurrencies on the bank’s balance sheet
According to Cointelegraph Brasil, the classification of cryptocurrencies as a good is significant. Recognition of cryptocurrencies as property would purportedly make them eligible to be used as a payment mechanism.
The central bank notes that these classifications were recommended by The Balance of Payments Statistics Committee — an advisory committee to the IMF Statistics Department that focuses on external sector statistics methodology.
IMF calls for scrutiny on Libra
As previously reported by Cointelegraph, IMF chief economist Gita Gopinath joined other officials in recommending that regulators be vigilant in observing and taking action against Facebook’s proposed cryptocurrency, Libra. Gopinath specifically called on global regulators to act immediately. Gopinath cited some specific concerns about Libra, too, saying:
“If you look particularly at countries that are not reserve currency countries, would this lead to backdoor dollarization? [...] All of these questions (and) whether there will be enough checks and balances in place to prevent money laundering ... are very important.”